Which Accounting firm Monitors the in and out in loans?
The phone number is a Lakewood 732 exchange.
One Rabbi Yaakov Siemiatycki is on the Bais Din, he is also the Rosh "Bais Din" of another "Bais Din".
Which Accounting firm Monitors the in and out in loans?
The phone number is a Lakewood 732 exchange.
One Rabbi Yaakov Siemiatycki is on the Bais Din, he is also the Rosh "Bais Din" of another "Bais Din".
Among the "Serious Kaporos issues";

Attention: Beef Purveyors and Certifying Agencies
The ongoing beef shortages of the past several years have reached a point where the industry can no longer treat this as a temporary inconvenience. We believe the time has come to introduce a non-Glatt line into the market, and we are asking you to take this seriously and act on it.
This is not a new or radical idea — it is a return to how things worked for most of American kosher history. Roughly seventy-five years ago, the great majority of kosher beef sold in this country was non-Glatt, and it was accepted as fully kosher by the overwhelming majority of Ashkenazi consumers. The wholesale shift to Glatt-only distribution followed Rabbi Yoel Teitelbaum's push to move the market away from non-shomer-Shabbos distribution channels — a legitimate concern at the time, but one that has since hardened into an assumption that Glatt is the only acceptable standard, which halacha itself does not require.
We also have practical precedent, both recent and current. In 2008, when the Agriprocessors shutdown triggered a nationwide kosher meat shortage, Harvard Row Kosher Meats in West Bloomfield, Michigan, working with the Council of Orthodox Rabbis of Greater Detroit (COR) under Rabbi Doniel Neustadt, began sourcing and selling properly supervised non-Glatt beef alongside its Glatt offerings. The COR provided full-time supervision to stand behind it, consumers were clearly informed of the distinction, and the community absorbed a supply shock without being pushed toward non-kosher meat. The Chicago Rabbinical Council (cRc) also had a non-Glatt line available a few years back.
And this isn't only a historical model — United Mehadrin Kosher (UMK) in St. Paul, Minnesota, under Rabbi Asher Zeilingold, certifies beef as non-Glatt today unless it is specifically labeled otherwise. The infrastructure and precedent already exist. There is no reason a version of this can't be made permanent and mainstream rather than treated as a regional or emergency-only measure.
With proper supervision and proper seals in place, there is no legitimate reason distribution logistics should stand in the way. That is a solvable problem, not a barrier — and it should not be used as an excuse for inaction.
What is not solvable, and what should concern every one of you, is what's already happening on the ground: simply raising the price of USA beef is pushing people — including those who are only marginally affected, not just those in real financial distress — toward non-kosher beef. That is a direct consequence of continuing with the status quo, and it is a consequence this community cannot afford to absorb.
We are not raising this as a suggestion to be filed away. It requires action.
If there is anything we can do to help move this forward, please advise.
Thanks,
Yehuda Shain
President Donald Trump’s administration said it plans to overhaul Head Start, tossing out many of the regulations that are the hallmark of the early education program for the nation’s poorest children.
Officials from the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the federally funded preschool program, said the proposed changes would encourage more local decision-making. Early childhood policy experts argue the deregulation could undermine Head Start’s position as the gold standard in early education.
Head Start centers serve around 700,000 of the nation’s most vulnerable children, including those who are homeless, in foster care or disabled. That wouldn’t change under the overhaul.
But Alex J. Adams, an assistant secretary at Health and Human Service, said the department is hoping to give Head Start centers the flexibility to change the way they operate. That means eliminating most of Head Start’s regulations, such as standards for low staff-to-student ratios or requirements to provide services to preschoolers’ families.
Hisachdus Harabonim of Brooklyn; Are allowing chocolate from a חלב עכו"ם manufacturer and being used in Parve chocolate without kashering.
Mashgichim have notified the Hisachdus Harabonim of Brooklyn; numerous times that Danishes, etc. with their Hashgocha that are milchig are coming to hotels, etc. without being marked properly, and they are being used after fleishig meals.
Hisachdus Harabonim of Brooklyn; Allows bakeries to use the same ovens for cheese cakes, cheese pastries and Parve without a proper cleaning and kashering.
BTW- the Orginzatsye Hashguchas i.e. OU doesn't allow kashering chocolate factories from milchig to parve.
They don't allow bakeries to bake dairy cheese and parve in the same oven.

| Coaching | Therapy |
|---|---|
| Client is emotionally and psychologically healthy | Client is emotionally unwell and in needs healing |
| Focuses on the present and future | Focuses on dealing with the past |
| Driven by goals and taking action | Driven by unresolved issues and feelings |
| Works toward a higher level of functioning | Works to achieve understanding and emotional healing |
| Results-based and focuses on exploring solutions | Explores the root of problems and offers explanation |
| Asks, “Where would you like to be and how can you get there?” | Asks, “How did that make you feel?” |
| Acts on information | Absorbs information |
| Done over the phone, internet or in person | Done in an office setting |
| Coach and client collaborate on solutions | Therapist is the ‘expert’ |
| Contact between sessions expected (accountability and wins) | Contact between sessions for crisis and difficulties only |
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Opinions | |||
|
Kosherica cruises has been machshil thousands in not providing kosher according to any standards.Public
Notice
Regarding Bodek and B'gan Frozen Strawberries
Recently, independent kashrus individuals
not affiliated with Bodek or B’gan have reportedly discovered insect
infestations in these imported frozen strawberries from Peru. These findings have called into serious question the reliability
of the current certifications, particularly because the specific authorities
being relied upon are widely known not to be specialized experts in insect
infestation or entomological kashrus inspection protocols. This
raises severe concerns within the community regarding whether the oversight is
sufficient to guarantee that the strawberries are entirely insect-free.
The
Halachic Context
From a halachic standpoint,
strawberries are widely recognized as much’zak be’tolaim (substantiated
and presumed to be infested). Due to the nature of their textured surface, many
halachic authorities maintain that it is virtually impossible to ensure they
are insect-free through standard commercial washing alone.
As a result, a growing consensus of
halachic experts advises that consumers should not rely on pre-washed frozen
strawberries—even those bearing multiple prominent certifications. Instead,
strawberries should only be used if they are completely peeled, as this is the
only definitive way to ensure they are free of insects.
Current
Actions and Lack of Public Alerts
Reports indicate that the certifying
Rabbonim have quietly directed companies to remove affected stocks from retail
store shelves. However, no public alerts have been issued to warn families who
may already have these products stored in their home freezers, or who may have
already used them in prepared foods.
The Problem with Undated Notices
Notably, both the B'gan and Bodek
consumer notices are undated. An undated notice is a significant irregularity
in any consumer-protection context:
The absence of dates and lot
identification points to a broader systemic concern: that a system relying on a
single initial inspection—conducted by an authority lacking specialized
infestation expertise, with no independent secondary reinspection—cannot reliably
distinguish clean lots from infested ones. If the certifiers were confident in
identifying which specific lots were affected, standard practice would be to
disclose them. The decision to instead pull all Peruvian-sourced
product, without dates or lot numbers, speaks for itself, THE CURRENT SYSTEM
DOES NOT WORK!
Conclusion
The lack of a transparent public
statement or formal clarification from the certifying Rabbonim in the wake of
these independent findings has created significant ambiguity for kosher
consumers. This prolonged silence leaves the current safety and halachic status
of these batches open to serious question, heightening the urgency for
consumers to discard these items or consult their own competent halachic
authorities before using them.
Truth of the matter is that there is some plain kosher Non-Glatt currently in the Market, but the supply must be enlarged considerably.
Currently there is the Hebrew National brands,
Zelingold's- UMK,
SBD -Rabbi Hatchual,
Rabbanut at postville and at solomon's shechitas.