Thursday, August 21, 2025

הרב חיים יושע העשיל באב"ד the head of Tartikuv Hashgocha is not anymore reliable than his brother Yechiel Babad, that Reb Moshe Shterbuch, Shlita, wrote not to rely on him in kashrus

 This Treif issue has allegedly been going on for years

They used at least 75% treif ice cream in theirs.

It was distributed to many of the Lakewood caterers among many other ones as well.

This Hashgocha publicized their so called בישול-ישראל potato chips while using 20% בישול-עכו"ם oil. 

The Minchas Chinuch Tartikuv had numerous times with the Galil products kosher and non-kosher in the same package or same bin, etc.

Educated kosher consumers should refrain from this Hashgocha.

There are numerous incidents.

They even don't feel they have to notify and post ads that this item is not kosher. Weeks have gone by since they found out.

As long as Mivakshei Kashrus, Irgun Shiurei Torah, Rabbis Bald, Feingold, Aurebach, Uri Newman, Bengio of NPGS, etc praise these type Hashgochas tells the consumer a lot about them.

In Yudel Shain's home and on his Hashgochas of affairs, there is no Minchas Chinuch/Tartikuv among some others ever used.





Monday, August 18, 2025

ALL Corn on the cob (frozen, Fresh, cooked, Microwavable) all infested. EVEN WHEN IT SAYS "NO CHECKING REQUIRED"








On the cob, it's impossible to check, the thrips are under the kernels!


UPDATE: Calif. delight W/ Hisachdus?

Rav Ekstein removed hashgocha.
Why?
Corn on the cob, is known to be infested, including the frozen ones.
 Even if it's soaked and salted.

Are the ones from Mexico, Thailand, any better? [No]

Does a Heimish Hashgocha  help to eliminate, not just minimize the insects? NO
Bottom line, (fresh & frozen, cooked) Remove the kernels & rinse.

NOT THE BABY CORN, as they don't have the insects- you don't have to de-kernelize baby-corn- eat as is.

Thursday, August 14, 2025

"TREIF "kosherica" tours R"L- Lakewood joins them R"L

WATCH: Kosherica launches ‘Yeshiva week’ "treif" cruise?

Kosherica cruises has been machshil thousands in not providing kosher according to any standards.

Why Do the  Rabbis sanction these non-kosher cruises? 
Isn't it embarrassing that all of the Miami, Lakewood,  OU affiliated Rabbis are allowing this scandal 

Can someone like Rabbis Weil (OU), Schneier, Riskin, Heir, Herring, Lipskar arrange an "OU" Hashgocha at least?

Why doesn't the "OU" send their own staff on the cruises to witness the kashrus disaster.

KOSHERICA style AND OTHERS Marketing "Yeshiva week" kosher cruises!

  Kosher at Sea: A Voyage into Illusion

The sky was a watercolor of pastels as the Emerald Majesty, a five-star cruise liner, pulled away from the port, her decks glittering under the sun like polished glass. Laughter echoed across the vast ship as thousands of passengers, in shorts and sundresses, scattered across pools, spas, and endless buffet stations. Amid the hum of festivities and the gentle churn of ocean waves, a more serious mission was quietly underway.

Dave, a seasoned events facilitator known across the industry for organizing grand-scale affairs, was aboard. Though not frum, Dave had worked closely with many Jewish clients over the years. He’d heard the buzz—kosher cruises were the new frontier of luxury. Frum families, Yeshivish businessmen, and even noted Rabbanim were now choosing ocean voyages billed as “fully kosher,” complete with Shiurim, Minyanim, and lavish kosher meals. But something gnawed at Dave’s instinct. He’d seen too much behind the curtain of event logistics not to wonder: How kosher is kosher at sea?

The Emerald Majesty carried over 4,500 souls—passengers and crew. Only around 250 were kosher-observant. Dave took quiet note of the math. The kosher kitchen, modestly tucked into a lower deck, was dwarfed by the sprawling ship-wide culinary operations spread across five different floors. Food storage. Pastry prep. Dairy refrigeration. Meat thawing. Fish filleting. All in different corners of the vessel.

He observed the Mashgichim, a small crew, each trying their best. But Dave was trained to spot systemic failures—not personal ones. In one kitchen, he watched as a treif griddle, recently used to cook cheeseburgers, was sprayed down with boiling water as a form of kashering. He knew enough to understand that such equipment required libun chamur—a direct flame, glowing coals, or a torch. Hot water alone would never do. Yet this shortcut was repeated. Day after day. Griddle after griddle.

Even more jarring: grills labeled “DAIRY” yesterday were now marked “MEAT.” The only cleansing? Another hasty splash of hot water. No fire. No burn-off. No halachic reset.

One morning, Dave joined a group at a shiur delivered by a Rabbi flown in for the cruise. Polished. Charismatic. Speaking passionately about emunah and bitachon. Yet just hours earlier, Dave had asked a Mashgiach whether the tray of fresh croissants in the dining hall was Parve, dairy, or had any proper labeling at all. The answer: “We think it’s parve. It came from one of the ship's bakeries.”

One of them?

At lunch, he noted dozens of unwrapped meat trays being wheeled from a general freezer. No visible Hashgacha. No labels. When asked, a Mashgiach simply shrugged. “They were stored in the kosher freezer. That’s usually a good sign.”

Usually?

But most chilling was the silence. Signs clearly stated: No Guests Allowed in Kitchen. But even more concerning—Mashgichim had been warned not to interact with guests. “Maintain separation,” they were told. “It’s a security policy.”

What it felt like, Dave observed, was a policy of concealment.

To the outside world, the cruise was spectacular. The frum crowd danced at kumzitzes on the upper deck under stars. Elegant buffets of chulent, schnitzel, and fresh-baked challah were served with flair. Children wore yarmulkes and girls sang zmiros as photographers snapped away.

But Dave had seen too much.

He’d seen the pastries with no source. The mishandled meat. The reused equipment. The unasked questions. The guessed answers. He’d seen Mashgichim overworked and under-trained, trying to keep pace in a behemoth system not designed for halachic integrity.

When he disembarked, Dave was resolute. “They can bring all the Rabbanim they want onboard. They can give all the shiurim and hand out kashrus certificates. But without real oversight, without understanding of halacha, without transparency—there is no Si’yata Di’Shmaya on these ships. It’s not kosher. Period.”

He hadn’t even touched the other concerns—of mingling, tznius breaches, the spiritual atmosphere. That, he said, was a separate storm.

But this storm—of misrepresenting kashrus—was real, and roaring just beneath the glimmering waves.

Takeaway:
Even the most luxurious kosher cruise cannot substitute for genuine kashrus vigilance. Without true halachic standards, experienced oversight, and transparency, kosher at sea becomes an illusion—one that risks both body and soul.

   

 You can't say "I didn't know".

Tuesday, August 12, 2025

British Journalist Ended The "Palestinian" Debate FOREVER!

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZ8Th-2CrhI

Historian- truth V Lies

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVeYUQBhRWA

Monday, August 11, 2025

In Kashrus Hashgochas, What's worse- "Ignorance" or "apathy"?

  KCL say "We don't know & We don't care!  

(Re: How to run a successful Kashru$ Organization)

From a comment;

What’s the story with the Milchiger = Kosher? Corrupt Restaurant in Howell NJ behind Amazing Savings called Ottimo Cafe?
They have the KCL = Stands for Kosher? Corrupt?? Lousy no hashgocho? 

Do they have a mashgiach temidei, the one I saw who claimed to be the Mashgiach temedei looked like a Am Ha’aretz and a Shaygetz with a Pepsi Yamalka. When I spoke with the KCL, the guy who answered the phone realized I had a point, and I told him there are serious Kashruth violations in the KCL when a restaurant does not have hashgochoh temedis. He did not answer when I asked him how often does the KCL administrators make unannounced check ups at this establishment.

During the time I was there, one and a half hours,, no Jew/yid stepped foot in the kitchen and goor heimisher and chassidische yidden went there and ate. There was a large function in the back hall of this place. A simcha and who is asking questions? What a Shanda and scandel.

Who does bedikas Toylay’im at this establishment? Suggest people should be more vigilant when frequenting “Kosher” establishments who don’t have any standards for hashgochoh. May tghe KCl who I understand now, has no standards and is totally hefker.




Central NJ Attorneys Experienced in Fighting Police Misconduct & Illegal Arrests

 Central NJ Attorneys Experienced in Fighting Police Misconduct & Illegal Arrests

NameFirmLocationPhone
Vincent J. Sanzone Jr.Law Office of Vincent J. Sanzone Jr.Elizabeth, NJ(908) 354-7006
Shelley L. StanglerLaw Offices of Shelley L. Stangler, P.C.Springfield / Roseland, NJ(973) 379-9572 or (877) 267-9907
Brian J. ZeigerThe Zeiger FirmLawrence Township, NJ(609) 215-7077
Christopher J. KeatingKeating Law Firm, LLCMoorestown, NJ(856) 519-5011
Clifford E. LazzaroLaw Office of Clifford E. Lazzaro, P.C.Freehold, NJ(732) 780-5200
Jonathan F. MarshallLaw Offices of Jonathan F. MarshallFreehold & Statewide, NJ(732) 462-1197


Sunday, August 10, 2025

Rav Breuer, Z"L on Kashrus-Hisachdus (Brooklyn) and Reb Zalman Leib will use Empire- as long as they'll check all Tzomes Ha'gidin - "Chimra", even though the kashrus is unacceptable

 Background: When Rav Dr. Yosef Breuer, Z”L, announced the establishment of the highly respected KAJ Kashrus, he stated:

“I am founding a kashrus organization that will adhere to basic kashrus standards, without chumras or hidurim.”

He explained his reasoning:

If one focuses on chumras and hidurim, eventually, there may be nothing left of basic kashrus.” 

Then the Chumras and Hidurim are irelevant. 

Today, Bnei Torah and Yeshiva Leit seek high-quality products with a reliable kashrus standard—one that maintains authenticity without unnecessary chumras and hidurim.

Tartikuv Minchas Chinuch, Yechiel Babad, et al stands out stands out very much in this are of Chimras/Hidirim, but no basic Kashrus.

Sunday, August 03, 2025

Assist suicide danger

 Consultant, Not Counselor- by S. N. Busch

During a recent case in which I was a circumstantial caregiver for an elderly patient receiving home-based palliative care, the boundaries of medical authority became starkly apparent. As New York's Medical Aid in Dying Act awaits Governor Hochul’s signature, questions about how physicians define their role in end-of-life care have never been more critical. 

The new physician was called in to evaluate the possibility of introducing IV fluids. After a quick glance at the patient and the data we presented, he asked to speak outside—and immediately adopted a psychological stance, urging acceptance of decline and recounting cautionary tales of families who "forced" care. He dismissed carefully documented observations, referring to them as "an ICU you have going on in there," and implied denial. We clarified that the previous doctor had requested the documentation and asked for it each time he had visited. But the new one stated, "I will determine… Don't try to be doctors. I am the doctor." The program's fixed schedule (a physician every X days, a nurse every Y, a social worker every Z weeks) was presented as immutable. Only after digging in our heels against the rigidity of the schedule ("... So we let the patient dehydrate until the next scheduled visit?") and the prescriptive worldview, did he offer a superficial "We don't give up on anyone…" before leaving.

We sought emergency care after the patient developed a fever within hours. He improved dramatically within 48 hours of arrival in the ER, progressing from unresponsive to communicating discomfort and needs.

Another case involved a patient with endocarditis who was being pushed towards a choice between biological and mechanical valve replacements. A cardiothoracic surgeon was summoned by the internist. He answered all the patient's questions, especially about the ramifications of each decision, neither of which sat well with the patient. The on average once-a-decade repeated biological valve replacement was not an attractive option, and being permanently on anticoagulants frankly frightened him, given both his tendency to clumsiness and having lost someone close to him to an overreaction to the same medication he'd be put on. While he acknowledged that there were no shared genes, the psychological barrier was present. The surgeon said to think about it. He later returned, "I just examined your studies – I hadn't examined your case myself earlier. I believe I can repair your valve." He explained what the repair would involve, and also shared that we should understand that it was him and us against the whole hospital. We gave him the go-ahead. Our joint decision stunned other medical staff, who asked in passing, "So, what did you choose?" when they saw the patient was post-op — and were shocked when he said that it was repaired, not replaced.

The contrast between these two clinical encounters illustrates how the integrity of medical care depends on physicians maintaining professional boundaries, offering clear, expert consultation without shifting into personal counseling, so that patients retain genuine autonomy in complex care decisions.

That cardiothoracic surgeon did a "world-class" job according to the patient's cardiologist and internist. The surgeon was essentially acting as an exceptional medical craftsman. He respected the psychological challenges, and didn't try to counsel his patient out of them. He also went to bat for his patient, resolving bureaucratic issues that had delayed the valve repair by preventing an infected tooth from being treated.

One physician expanded his medical problem-solving to the point of advocacy, while respecting boundaries; the other contracted his medical assessment while overstepping into counseling.

When patients say, in whatever form, "Give it to me straight, Doc," the request may reflect a desire for clarity, or for guidance. But it's often interpreted as a cue to narrow the conversation, or to translate uncertainty into preemptive finality. The line between clinical interpretation and personal framing can shift, especially under cultural, societal, systemic, or political pressures, given the ever-more multicultural makeup of both service provider and service recipient. That shift is rarely acknowledged when it happens, and ay, there's the rub.

Physicians face many pressures: time constraints, systemic demands, institutional expectations, and patient hopes, in addition to their own cultural and religious backgrounds that can subtly influence how they present options or outcomes. Patients sometimes expect or ask physicians to provide guidance on existential or spiritual matters, but even then, physicians should clearly direct them to chaplains, counselors, or social workers who specialize in that support. The goal must remain clear communication grounded in medical expertise, coupled with respectful acknowledgment of the patient's broader life context, and appropriate referrals when needed.

And policymakers should let physicians reclaim what brought them to medicine in the first place: offering not closure, but care: Medical Aid in Living.