Friday, March 26, 2021

CRC ALERT: Romaine heaviy infested- Therefore, Buy only the Positive or kosher Garden brands

March 25, 2021

 

Please be advised that in recent days we have been finding romaine lettuce to be more infested than usual.  In particular, we have been finding more thrips than would be expected. 


Accordingly, extra care and diligence should be used when preparing romaine lettuce for the Seder.  The “thrip cloth method” (https://www.crcweb.org/askcrc/Thripcloth.php)  remains effective, but the procedure may have to be repeated several times to remove all insects.  


An alternative method is to separate the leaves, soak them in soapy water, and then rub all parts of each leaf with a sponge or scrubber. The leaves can then be used as is.

 

The above concern is, because of the unusually high levels of infestation in romaine lettuce, we have just determined that the usual washing process has not been sufficient in some instances. 


Therefore, we recommend that the whole leaf romaine lettuce be rewashed by placing the leaves into soapy water and then rinsing each leaf front and back under running water. The chopped variety may be used as is, without additional washing.

 

Kehiloth Magazine is a "Treif" publication



Thursday, March 25, 2021

UPDATE: Shatnez Alert: Don't buy clothing from Lakewood Emporio stores, until it's checked by a Lab affiliated with the International testers

SUITS sold in EMPORIO- Lakewood has been found to contain Shatnez. Therefore, all of their suits must be re-checked by a qualified shatnez Lab.

Shatnez has been found in David Oliver suits sold at the Suite Shoppe.

All shoulder pads that have been put in by the right place may contain Shatnez and must be replaced.

GEFLOCHTENE SILVER ATOROS sold by Judaica Plaza have been found to contain linen within the Atorah.




Tuesday, March 16, 2021

Alert: A completly unreliable fraudlent Hashgocha on wigs, per Rav Moshe Shternbuch, Shlita, per Rav Eliyashev, Z"L & many others

RAV MORDECHAI GROSS'S GOOD NAME WAS HI-JACKED BY AVROHOM SCHLESINGER, RAV GROSS HAS "NO IDEA" OF WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THESE HASHGOCHAS.

Shatnez Alert


ROCK SALMON-WHAT IS IT??? it's non-kosher canned salmon

From Wikipedia encyclopedia: Rock Salmon is the flesh of the dogfish, wolffish or catfish, also known as hass/huss. [Non-kosher, of course- Y.S.] Renamed by marketeers to make the fish more appealing to consumers. it is from the Shark family.
Note: Canned skinless and boneless Rock Salmon has the flesh texture an reddish color of late season canned salmon- Per US Fisheries Department the one way to differentiate the difference is by a simple sodium test. As canned Salmon has a few grains of salt put into the can prior to cooking the raw salmon in the can. Rock Salmon does not have any salt put in the can prior to cooking the raw Rock Salmon.

Therefore, flesh color of salmon is not reliable 

Wednesday, March 03, 2021

KAJ pulled the Hashgocha from Empire, due to serious issues- FYI- "only" Some Lakewood caterers refuse to use Empire's kashrus standards

Always ask caterer, "do you use Empire"?

FYI- ONLY SOME Lakewood caterers will not use the Empire poultry.

KCL is a  Lakewood political Organization, making a lot of money off of Kashrus.

KCL subscribes to PAY FOR PLAY.

Tuesday, February 23, 2021

Danger on the horizon

Dear Yehuda,

What’s next in the legal revolution to reshape America?
 
Bruce DeBoskey writes a nationally syndicated column regarding charitable matters.  I met Bruce at a meeting of the Attorneys for Family-Held Enterprises event and ended up on his newsletter list.

Recently he has been writing more about changing the charitable exemption laws.  I take his writing to indicate the leading edge of this change in America.  He is describing a problem and a solution and lobbying for that solution.  I take him seriously.  He is the kind of person who writes about something he is not merely suggesting, but actually working to lobby for the change he is advocating.  I would expect that this will be seen in the mainstream discourse in short order.  He is seeding into the public consciousness the next step in the transformation of America.  In other words, I think is unwise to dismiss his ideas as “it will never happen.”  I explain later how it could happen.
 
Here’s are the problems he identifies.  He points to his desired solutions through questions:
 
Problem #1 – Too many organizations have 501(c)(3) status that have no genuine “public good.”  Groups saving pot-bellied pigs are questionable and hate groups are even more obvious.
 
Solution #1 – Create a definition of what is really for the “public good” and eliminate the exemption for those organizations who don’t meet the standard. 
 
Problem #2 – Churches, synagogues and non-profits do not pay local property taxes but still use services such as roads, police and fire. 
 
Solution #2 – Eliminate property tax exemption for religious institutions
 
Problem #3 – Megachurches – make too much money and it’s all tax free. And their leaders, make too much money, too. 
 
Solution #3 – Mr. DeBoskey is not explicit, but I would guess it would involve taxing income from sales of products and salary limits on clergy. 
 
He asks:
  • How does society define the “public good” in a way that prioritizes those nonprofit programs needed by our country and whose missions actually advance our shared values?
  • Does the cost/benefit of the charity exemption and donation deductibility make good economic and policy sense for 21st century society?
So donation deductibility is also on the table.
 
“This reexamination will involve the honest commitment of policy and tax experts, economists, elected officials and the nonprofit sector itself to ensure that the charity “deal” actually works to improve our cities and states, our country and our world in ways that make the most sense for the times in which we live.”
 
Now was DeBoskey just musing on matters that concern him, or is he part of the larger campaign to bring about these changes?  Is there something in between the lines in his mind?  I don’t know.  But, I believe that there is a campaign to bring about these changes and I’ll address what I see as between the lines, the consequences of the campaign, how it might play out and what we can do about it.
 
Between the lines #1: Ideological purge of charitable status for any organization that is not meeting the “standard” as applied by a bureaucrat all for the public good.  DeBoskey singles out the protection of pot-bellied pigs and hate groups as making a questionable or no contribution to the public good.  But I don’t think anyone is really after the pot-bellied pig protectors.  They are just a convenient showcase since few feel moved by pot-bellied pigs.  And the ‘hate groups’ are something everyone agrees to hate but they cannot be the real target because they are only a tiny fraction of non-profits and getting rid of their exempt status will not increase tax revenue.  The larger goal here is to empower the government with the ability to decide what is in the “public good.”  Today the list may look agreeable to almost all, but the ideological purity test will rapidly shift and expand to exclude a whole range of causes.  The key is to get the discussion and agreement going that we all agree to exclude “them” and later we will find ourselves excluded, originally just from exempt status and then later labelled as “not for the public good.”   
 
Between the lines #2:  Shutter the doors on the small churches that cannot afford the real-estate taxes.  Talk about hitting the poor communities whose membership cannot afford the contributions.  The exemption from real estate taxes not only shows that religious worship is the top American priority and that we all are willing to pay for it, but the exemption levels the playing field for new congregations that do not have the coffers of long established houses of prayer.  (Parking space requirements similarly work to harm new congregations while old established congregations sometimes have not a single parking spot.)
 
Between the lines #3:  Salary caps for clergy will be pushed just as they are being pushed for publicly traded companies and non-profits.  In the mind of socialists, everything is measured by the public good, as defined by them, and not by the consumers choice.  The mega churches are offering something that people are willing to pay for.  If you don’t like it, don’t buy it.  
 
Here is how I predict this will play out:
 
Expect a trickle, then a steady stream of news articles and new programs about groups that “should not” have exempt status, that do “no public good.”  Stories that show that terrible ideas are getting exemptions, or most of the money is going to administration or the lavish lifestyles of a church leader.  Stories about a church that burned and required a lot of local firefighting resources but since it was exempt for real estate taxes it did not contribute to the cost of that fire-fighting.  Maybe a Congressional investigating committee to hear supporting testimony.
 
As urged in the DeBoskey article, the process will be dominated by experts and the public encouraged to defer to those experts.  “Policy” experts, tax experts, economic experts, non-profit experts, all to override the common sense of the average man and woman. 
 
And, the current non-profits will have a voice too, but they are actually not reliable.  They have a vested interest in creating a test they will mostly pass, but that will be a barrier to entry to new non-profits in the future.  There is a false perception that non-profits are more civic minded than the regular citizen.  In some cultures, the concept of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO’s) is on par with the government and given equal status to implement policy and objectives.  They become the means to reshape society in the image of the agenda without the obstacles faced by government.  But non-profits are run by humans with an agenda that is often, but not always, reflected in the name of the organization.  We can’t defer our responsibilities to them either.   
 
In response to the call to regulate non-profits and eliminate exemptions, the non-profits will divide into three groups:  Those that think this is fantastic because they are confident they will survive the ideological purges.  Those that will fight it.  And those who will pretend it does not require their involvement and let others fight against it.
 
First, those that fight it will first say it is outrageous and the “public good” standard should not be made more exact.   Then they will form a coalition to fight it, perhaps calling themselves the US Chamber of Non-Profits or the American Non-Profit Alliance.  Advocates of the non-profit changes will lay the groundwork by attacking the coalition as supporters of terrorists and extremists.  The coalition will then decide that to receive more public support they need to tone down their position to sound more reasonable and will start to offer compromise solutions.  They will agree to the elimination of exemptions for the “fringe” – after all they are not the fringe.  Soon after they will be writing position letters to the US Treasury stating that the problem is great and a solution is needed but the proposal is too extreme and should be merely tweaked to address some issues.  They might even have “discussions” seeking compromise with the change proponents and may even come to agreement on who they are willing to eliminate because all sides agree that “those” organizations are offensive and not for the “public good.”  And the members of the coalition will be told that this is the only way to go, that they must compromise because it’s the only way to have any influence on the process.  And then once the regulations are approved, the coalition will not challenge it in court since they helped craft it.  The people who didn’t wake up in time will now be stuck and they won’t have the financial resources to challenge it in court because the coalition will not back them.  And then everyone will discover that the limited list they had agreed on is being expanded.
 
This my friends is how freedom is lost.  Voluntarily.  This is the playbook on issue after issue.  Oppose, set up a phony dialectic, then compromise to look more supportable, then lose outright.  This is how programs and agencies became part of everyday life in America, and how the revolutionary objectives will now be rolled out and become reality, G-d forbid, in America.  And subsequent administrations that promise to restore freedom will at most only chip away at the infrastructure but never actually dismantle the infrastructure.     
 
The solution is to stick to the truth.  America supports religion.  America was founded by religion.  The idea that we have G-d given inalienable rights is a religious idea.  And we are willing to pay for the government services needed to keep that priority first.  When I am driving on a Sunday and I see police officer directing traffic at a church, I don’t complain “why am I paying for that?”  I don’t need similar city services because an Orthodox Jewish synagogue by definition cannot make a traffic jam on Shabbos.  But, rather than complaining, I am grateful to live in America.
 
And we specifically do not want to define the public good.  We don’t want to have the discussion that DeBoseky calls for.  That some groups that I do not agree with receive tax breaks and their donors receive deductions is the price of my liberty.
 
We already know where this discussion is going.  They will not be asking me or you to vet which groups are for the public good.  I would guess that they will look, as an example, to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) which maintains a list of who they have decided are “hate” groups and “extremist” groups.  Using the term “extremist” implies that there is the agreed upon center.  But that is not agreed upon.  The SPLC has positioned itself as the “authority” on which groups are good and bad and their work is now relied on by media, banks, social media and even government authorities.  Whether you agree with their ratings, they have an agenda and a worldview and clear operational objectives and those are reflected in their “ratings.” 
 
Let’s dig deeper: If someone or something is for the “public good” there must be those who are “not for the public good.”  Something “not for the public good” quickly becomes a danger to the public good and under the socialist principles afoot today, must be eliminated, “for the public good.”   Don’t fantasize that you can agree to the distinction and emerge unscathed.
 
Our shared values in America are already established.  We encourage charitable donations to non-profits and facilitate that by allowing a charitable deduction.  We put religion first by exempting houses of worship and the homes of clergy from real estate taxation.  That’s already long established.  The shared value is also that we don’t give the government the power to decide which is a good use of our charitable money.
 
The laws don’t suddenly change.  National priorities don’t suddenly change.  They shift through concerted campaigns that sway public outrage at a “problem” or “crisis” and then focus public demand for the “solution.”  All these changes are voluntary, usually because you voluntarily chose not to pay attention.  So read the leading indicators and know what is at stake.  And take action to refocus America on the source of liberties and the price we have to pay to have them.
 
As to the problems and solutions DeBoskey highlights, the real solution is not to agree to the discussion in the first place. 
 
Sincerely,
 
E. David Smith, Esq


Copyright © 2021 Smith & Associates, All rights reserved.
Our mailing address is:
Smith & Associates
400 Broadacres Drive
Suite 260
Bloomfield, NJ 07003

Monday, January 04, 2021

Shatnez Alert- De Ja Vu

Some consumers are under the impression that garments purchased at Jewish-owned
businesses need no shatnez testing, especially when the proprietor states so. 

The attached consumer notice should lead the kosher consumer to a different conclusion.

Thursday, December 24, 2020

Who is Yechiel Kalish, the new CEO of Hatzalah of New York-and they aren't even ashamed of themselves, for taking him


A Liberal life-style Advocate- all of the Shmutz is a go.

Covid info, do not confuse with the vaccines

This article is one of PIKUACH NEFESH.  Please take it very seriously and forward the content to anyone who is COVID positive and has a risk factor.

As many people know, I had recently been hospitalized with COVID.   There are ways to seriously minimize the effects of COVID – which many people are unaware of.  When I was in the height of it, I tried to get Monoclonal Antibodies – but it was not available. An organization got me into Mt. Sinai, and  I was given plasma antibodies, and that, in combination with steroids, antiviral Resvedevir and anticoagulants helped me significantly.

Monoclonal Antibodies, however, are even better than plasma antibodies – reducing hospitalization rates up to 70% according to the latest studies.   

People who test positive must let their physician know early on, and not allow themselves to be treated at home with oxygen etc. without physician supervision. Once someone is on O2, they will not qualify for monoclonal anymore.  There are protocols in numerous hospitals that allow physician to get their patients treated as outpatients.

There is an organization called CPI (call 828 4 PLASMA) which can help patients get into to the following six places that offer this treatment. [There are more of course]. This organization got me into treatment at Mt. Sinai.  Their email is: monoclonal@CovidPlasmaSaveALife.com and the website is – PlasmaHeroes.com

  1. Sinai (NYC)
  2. Maimonides (Brooklyn)
  3. Northwell (SI and LI)
  4. Good Samaritan (Rockland)
  5. Monmouth Medical Center South Campus (Lakewood, NJ)
  6. Hackensack Meridian Health (NJ)

Not enough people know about it.   Tell anyone you know.  It was originally approved by the FDA in November.  The first one was made by Eli Lilly and called, “Bamlanivimab.”   received an emergency use authorization from the US Food and Drug Administration in early November. Less than two weeks later, the agency granted an EUA to Regeneron’s monoclonal antibody cocktail, made up of two monoclonal antibodies, Casirivimab and Imdevimab, and called REGEN-COV2.

This second one was the one given to President Trump.  It worked fabulously.

The fact is that according to the FDA, monoclonal antibodies should be given as soon as possible after symptoms emerge.

So as soon as you test positive call that number.  They will prioritize high risk people who are a] 65 or older, or b] BMI of 35 or more or c] underlying health conditions.

 

The author can be reached at yairhoffman2@gmail.com

Monday, November 30, 2020

Satmar butcher store re-call ordered by USDA


WASHINGTON, Dec. 4, 2020 – Continental Glatt Kosher Meats Corp., doing business as First Choice Kosher Meat & Deli Inc., a Spring Valley, N.Y. firm, is recalling approximately 61,504 pounds of ready-to-eat (RTE) meat and poultry products that were produced without the benefit of federal inspection, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced today.

The RTE meat and poultry items were produced on various dates from June 26, 2020, through Nov. 20, 2020, with various sell-by dates ranging from October 2, 2020, through April 18, 2021. The products subject to the recall can be found on the following spreadsheet. [View Labels (PDF Only)]       

The products subject to recall bear establishment number “EST. 40009” inside the USDA mark of inspection. These items were shipped to retail locations in New York.        

The problem was discovered when the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets alerted FSIS about meat and poultry products produced by Continental Glatt Kosher Meats Corp., without the benefit of federal inspection and bearing the mark of inspection from another establishment without authorization.

Monday, November 16, 2020

Kosher meat war of 1902

The great kosher meat war of 1902 is the wildest protest you’ve never heard of

By Reed Tucker-November 16, 2020 | 4:38pm

Crowds gather in front of a butcher shop in the early 1900s. The organizers expected just 50 people. But on May 15, 1902, nearly 500 women packed into the meeting hall at 88 Monroe St. on the Lower East Side, with more gathered outside.

“New York never saw such a huge gathering of Jewish women,” one of the local newspapers proclaimed.

And the women were angry. The ladies took turns addressing the crowd, but it was Fanny Levy, a 35-year-old mother of six, who had the line of the evening. Lamenting the lack of results that efforts from others had brought, Levy exhorted the crowd, “This is their strike? Let the women make a strike; then there will be a strike!”

For an early example of activism and the power of women in New York City, look no further than the kosher meat strike of 1902 — a mostly forgotten incident that tore the Lower East Side apart. “This is an early example of consumer activism,” says Scott D. Seligman, author of the new book, “The Great Kosher Meat War of 1902: Immigrant Housewives and the Riots That Shook New York City” (Potomac Books).

The trouble began when the price of kosher beef shot up some 50 percent in just a few months. “At 18 cents a pound — $5.25 in today’s dollars — kosher beef was now beyond the reach of families that had to pinch pennies to make ends meet,” the author writes.

The Lower East Side’s massive Jewish community was understandably upset and felt the price hike was due to more nefarious forces than just simple supply and demand. They weren’t wrong. “There was no question the price was being manipulated,” Seligman said.

‘We must take a hand in this meat fight’

Inside a kosher butcher shop in New York City.

By the turn of the century, most New Yorkers were getting their meat from Chicago slaughterhouses. Cattle were raised in Midwestern fields, killed in industrial mills, then the carcasses were shipped east on refrigerated rail cars.

Kosher beef, however, had numerous restrictions — most crucially that it had to be soaked in salt water no more than 72 hours after the animal had been killed.

The prohibition meant that kosher beef had to be trucked in from the Midwest alive and butchered in one of New York’s fast-disappearing abattoirs. The extra steps made kosher meat more expensive than nonkosher meat.

The meat was then distributed by a wholesaler to the numerous Jewish butcher shops that dotted the Lower East Side. “[Jewish women] bought meat frequently and in small quantities; economies of scale from larger purchases were out of reach for most, not only because of a shortage of cash, but also a lack of iceboxes,” Seligman writes.

From a supply perspective, the problem was that nearly the entire American beef business at the time was controlled by just four firms. “It is alleged that these firms have an agreement, which makes it possible for them to boost the price of fresh meats whenever they want to,” the New York Sun wrote at the time.

The so-called beef trust was engaging in price fixing, leading to the spike in prices.

At first, the butchers (most of whom were only making about $10 a week) tried to boycott the wholesaler in hopes of forcing a price reduction. But their action was sporadic, with some shops remaining open.

Ultimately, that boycott failed to bring results.

That’s when the women got involved. “These were middle-aged, Orthodox, not terribly educated, immigrant women who had not been in the US for so long,” Seligman said. “They were living in tenements on the Lower East Side. Most didn’t work outside the home.” They quickly banded together, coming up with a plan for action.

“The time has arrived when we must take a hand in this meat fight,” a Yiddish flyer printed at the time read. “With our money, the butchers buy diamonds and wear diamonds . . . Now, what shall we say, dear sisters, when they give us stone and bone and charge us 5 cents more?”

The group agreed to station five women on each block containing a kosher butcher shop to “dissuade customers from patronizing them.” After that Monroe Street meeting, the women were out in the streets, some 3,000 strong.

“These immigrant women, who can barely muster English taking to the streets, that got me interested,” the author writes. “My grandmother and great-grandmother were living on Orchard Street, and I like to believe they were involved.” It didn’t take long for trouble to kick off.

Windows smashed, protesters beaten

A group of Lower East Side women talk with a potential buyer outside a butcher shop.

On Cherry Street, a butcher named Jacob Kalinsky sold a piece of chuck steak to a customer. The women watching his shop pounced on the customer when she emerged from the shop, grabbing the meat and tossing it into the gutter.

They then burst into the shop and began destroying the butcher’s stock.

The police soon arrived and arrested 11 women. As they carted them off, a group of more Jewish women assembled, who pelted the officers with meat. “One woman, a nursing baby in her arms, flung a plate at a policeman, knocking the helmet off his head,” Seligman writes.

Windows of butcher shops were smashed, and protesters beaten.

The next morning the neighborhood “looked as though it had been bombed.” But the women returned the streets, some carrying sticks and “well-sharpened nails.”

On Saturday, the demonstrators made the rounds of the synagogues in the neighborhood, trying to enlist more to their cause.

Some received them warmly. Others dismissed them. One rabbi insisted the women were ignorant and not competent to manage a boycott. East River slaughterhouses in the early 1900s. Over the next several days, the boycott dragged on.

“It will be a question of endurance between us,” one of the women, Caroline Schatzberg, said at the time. “If the retailers can afford to pay rent and do no business, I guess we can afford to do without meat. Fish and vegetables are pretty good food at this time of year, and we can stand it as long as they can.”

The sporadic violence continued as well, and the boycotters found other creative ways to dissuade customers from patronizing butcher shops.

“The women went from shop to shop and asked at each one to examine the various grades of beef offered for sale,” the author writes. “After it was brought out of the ice box, they would handle it as much as possible and expose it to air in an effort to spoil its fresh appearance . . . They left each store without making any purchases.”

Change was on the way

A cartoon by Charles L. Bartholomew, circa 1902, depicts President Theodore Roosevelt holding a gun while a cow labeled “beef trust” sits on the moon reading a newspaper.

By the end of May, the boycott won a huge victory when the Butchers’ Association agreed to join the cause, saying that they were “ready to close their stores and align themselves with the people to oppose the [beef producers].”

The women also took matters into their own hands. They raised money within the community and opened a cooperative butcher shop. The store, located at 245 Stanton St., was run by a woman named Sarah Cohn.

On its opening day, the store was mobbed.

“Housewives with their baskets stood in line a block away,” the New-York Tribune wrote at the time. “Men left their work and waited for hours to get the first meet the family had tasted for weeks. People rose before daylight to be the first at the door.”

Ultimately, the price of kosher meat in all local butcher shops fell to affordable levels, a reduction driven in part by the federal government’s investigation of the meat industry’s price fixing.

But the marginalized people of New York had learned an important lesson, according to Seligman: “They no longer needed any coaxing or convincing that they had the ability to change their situation. “Bustling Lower East Side markets are visited by patrons.

 

Saturday, November 14, 2020

Secular Chareidim?

Secular Chareidim ! By  Rabbi Avrohom Gordimer  Nov 11, 2020

Last week, I perused a local “heimishe” weekly magazine, which of course focused on the recent elections. Although this magazine’s circulation is assuredly far smaller than that of the Yated and the other major frum publications, I came away, to be blunt, pretty disgusted.

Aside from the token Torah columns, I would characterize this heimishe magazine as basically secular. Its analysis of the elections, featuring a mix of Orthodox and irreligious Jewish pundits, and plenty of non-Jewish contributors, consisted of all types of calculations and prognostications about who should win and why, evaluating every factor out there – except one: ratzon Hashem. In fact, the words “Hashem,” “G-d,” “Hashgocha Protis” and the like were nowhere to be found. Everything that occurred and that was predicted to transpire as a result of the elections was presented as a function of campaign strategies and political maneuvering, media influence and public perception, Covid-19 and the courts. Obviously, these are indeed these mechanisms at play, but, ultimately, Hashem is mamlich melochim and is the G-d of history. If we, as frum Jews, take a totally secular approach to world events, we are abandoning our raison d’être.

Election Fraud This is particularly relevant as we read about what appear to be substantive allegations of election fraud on every level: hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of ballots discarded; election observers illegally barred from monitoring ballot counting; innumerable fraudulent ballots being filed; ballots sent in by people no longer residing in a state and even no longer alive; ballot numbers exceeding the number of eligible voters; and ballots being accepted with late postmarks or with no postmarks at all. If ,at the end of the day, lawsuits with these allegations are dismissed and Joe Biden is sworn in as president, such is the ratzon Hashem. Those who may have perpetrated lies and stolen the election will have to answer to the Ribono Shel Olam, but in the end, it is He Who determines the course of events.

(Please note that I voted for Donald Trump. I felt it was a no-brainer. Issues of national security, law and order, the economy/employment, energy, and of course Eretz Yisroel, religious values/religious freedom, and the simple need for hakoras hatov were clear as day. When liberals would counter, “Don’t personal example, middos tovos and integrity matter?” I would point to the 42nd president and his wife, whose countless acts of immorality and deception, and whose commission of nearly every crime in the book, made them more corrupt than the most heinous mafia kingpins, yet Democrats still revere this felonious couple, and those who criticize Trump for his demeanor and sense of ethics hypocritically support the corrupt 42nd president and his wife, whose commission of acts of moral turpitude is almost unchallenged in American political history. We vote for a commander-in-chief, not a mashgiach ruchani-in-chief, as nice an ideal as it might be, but one to which no candidate from any party can come close to aspiring. I thus do not write this article as someone who is pro-Democrat in the slightest, and I would love for Trump to succeed in his legal challenges to the election; such is proper hishtadlus. But we speak here of the broader perspective.)

Many contend that JFK stole the 1960 election and that Al Franken did the same thing in Minnesota in 2008, when he was elected to the US Senate. Perhaps so, and perhaps we will never know. While those who perpetrated corruption will ultimately be held accountable by the Aibishter for their crooked and evil actions, the end result of having these people elected was Hashem’s Will. But unfortunately, there are some members of acheinu Bnei Yisroel who otherwise come across as fine frum Yidden who are so preoccupied and obsessed with politics and current events that they no longer view things from a Torah perspective and naturally believe that major world occurrences are the result of political strategies, persuasive lobbying, good timing, partisan interests, clever scheming and cover-ups on the part of fraudsters, and perhaps “luck.” Oy meh hayah lonu that some “bnei Torah” and “heimishe Yidden” have unwittingly embraced such a belief system, not realizing how it undermines and totally contravenes hashkofas haTorah.

Yosef’s Perplexing Trip to Shechem- What better example do we have than the narrative of Yosef being sent by Yaakov Avinu to Shechem in search of Yosef’s brothers?

Yaakov and Yosef realized that dispatching Yosef by himself to a distant, isolated area in order to find his brothers and report back, in the context of their great animosity toward him, was quite risky, to put it mildly. Yosef could have replied to his father Yaakov, “I am happy to do what my father asks, but my father should please consider the danger into which I am being placed.” Yet, the Hashgocha decided otherwise, as Yaakov and Yosef, who were holy, clairvoyant and brilliant men, went full speed ahead into a mission of extreme doom, which from a practical perspective any ordinary person of far lesser intelligence would have naturally shunned. Yosef, the wise visionary, later understood and explained why things occurred as they did and how this intricately-planned web of events miraculously unfolded, leading to the yeshuah of Klal Yisroel and the future geulah, and that it was all of course from Hashem, from A to Z. Yosef is the rebbi for all future generations in teaching Hashgocha Protis.

This affirmation that Hashem is the G-d of history is what the Torah teaches and what we of course proudly espouse, but it appears to now be softly challenged, without even realizing it, by some Torah Jews who are steeped and submerged in politics and have been sucked in by the belief system of the secular political arena.

Professional Wrestling I recall that there were times when the referee was inexplicably distracted during a match, whereupon one wrestler would quickly take a cloth soaked in an unknown substance, show it gleefully to the audience, and apply it to his opponent’s face so as to anesthetize or seemingly kill him, such that the opponent would immediately collapse in the ring, at which point the referee would suddenly no longer be distracted, turn around, notice the fallen wrestler unable to rise and declare the wrestler who applied the illegal substance to the downed wrestler as the winner. This would happen all the time, as a wrestler, his coach or an unknown person in the audience would distract the referee for just enough time for another wrestler to render his opponent unconscious or bruise him bloodily by piercing him in the face with a steel bar “hidden” in his pants or by breaking a heavy object on his head, after which the referee would suddenly turn back around and award the offender with a victory, for the opponent assumedly lost in a fair fight, the end of which the referee conveniently happened to miss while distracted. (For some reason, paramedics were never called in, and the loser always got up and walked back to his locker room as he angrily mumbled, “Next time!”)

I remember how the fans were so incredibly frustrated, as the referee was oblivious to the obvious injustice that occurred moments ago. It happened every week, and each time, the winner “stole” the match by cheating. Or so it appeared.

The exasperated fans failed to realize that it was all orchestrated to occur that way. It was part of a master plan, carefully schemed and rehearsed to yield the desired result.

And so is it in life, lehavdil, that matters that might seem unjust to the average person and which determine major events in the global annals of humanity are in fact under the full and unmitigated control of Hashem. We must accept what happens and not be frustrated by the seeming injustices, as we view the picture from a Torah perspective of Hashgocha Protis and not from the perspective of ignorant and unrefined professional wrestling fans.

As the Ramban essentially explains, there are two levels to such situations: Hashem’s master plan for Klal Yisroel and the world is fulfilled, while those who chose to act wrongly will be punished by Hashem in the time to come. We need not and should not get upset, attributing that which happens to people’s corrupt actions, cheating and lies. They will be held accountable for sure, but the emes is that Hashem’s Hashgocha is at work, and it is often inscrutable and unable to be understood by the finite human mind.

Secular Chareidim I discussed the topic of political obsession and lack of inspiration on the part of some frum Jews with a family member last week and was told in response that this person’s rosh yeshiva blames the internet and social media for people going off the derech. I initially wondered how to interpret this, as the rosh yeshiva did not refer to people reading kefirah online or being exposed to inappropriate material, which of course can really damage a person’s ruchniyus. It then struck me that the rosh yeshiva was referring to the above phenomenon, in which people become infatuated with political or social endeavors, due to the ease of immersion therein through electronic media, and come to accept the values presented there, which they unknowingly absorb over time. Eventually, Torah commitment and belief become mere formalities that “get in the way” of what these people feel is really important. The result after a while might be a person who is off the derech totally, or might be the emergence of “secular chareidim” – people who look like bnei Torah and fully adhere to the Torah’s “rituals,” but whose belief system is thoroughly foreign to the Torah, as they attribute world events to political strategies, economics, media manipulation and perhaps “luck.”

Let us take a step back and realize that just like Yosef’s trip to Shechem might have seemed absurd from a secular perspective, but was in fact Hashgochas Hashem, so too is all that transpires the work of the G-d of history, and that the apparently unholy mechanisms at play are indeed geared to ultimately fulfill His Will.

 

Thursday, November 05, 2020

The Democrats motto





"It is enough that the people know there was an election. 
The people who cast the votes decide nothing. 
The people who count the votes decide everything."
truefalse