|
|
|
|
https://dusiznies.blogspot.com/2026/03/how-lakewoods-freezer-fatwa-goes.html
The Lakewood "Freezer" Policy: Torah, Science, and the Shidduch Crisis Rabbi Yair Hoffman
There are several thousand more young women than young men currently in shidduchim — daughters of yungeleit, struggling baalei batim, and ordinary families, many of whom have not received a single shidduch inquiry in months. The Torah commands us not to stand idly by. The time to act is now.
What the Science Shows
The Midrash teaches: Chochma baGoyim — taamin. The empirical wisdom of the nations is to be taken seriously. Three world-class scientists have produced findings that apply with precision to the shidduch crisis.
Nobel Laureate Alvin Roth (Stanford, 2012 Nobel Prize in Economics) documented a phenomenon called "unraveling" — when one side of a matching system is held back and released in a synchronized wave, the result is catastrophic congestion. Participants are stranded not due to any shortage of partners, but purely because of structural timing failure. The parallel to the Freezer is not metaphorical — it is exact.
MIT's John D.C. Little proved mathematically that once a timing imbalance is introduced into a matching system, the backlog will grow inevitably — regardless of the goodwill, effort, or intentions of any participant. No amount of harder work by shadchanim or families can overcome a structural distortion. The math is the math.
How the Pipeline Breaks
The primary cause of the crisis is the age gap — bochurim typically marry girls several years younger, and since the Jewish population grows each year, more girls enter shidduchim than boys. The Freezer compounds this: while bochurim are restricted from dating for three and a half months, girls continue entering the pool unimpeded. When the boys are released, they gravitate toward the newest, youngest entrants, bypassing girls who have been waiting longest. Over thirty years, the Male Dating Start Date has crept from roughly 20 to 23 or 24 — and each incremental delay, compounded over a growing population, has left exponentially more young women without prospects.
The Halachic Record Is Unambiguous
The greatest poskim of the previous generation — the Chazon Ish, Rav Shach, Rav Elyashiv, Rav Shteinman, Rav Kanievsky, Rav Gershon Edelstein, and others — all ruled that a yeshivah Freezer policy constitutes masneh al mah shekasuv baTorah — a condition contradicting a Torah obligation — and is therefore null and void. Rav Shach stated plainly: "You cannot make a bas Yisroel wait three months. If a good shidduch comes your way, you are obligated to pursue it." Rav Kanievsky wrote in his own handwriting that no bachur in any yeshivah is obligated to adhere to such a restriction.
It Has Been Done Before
In 1160, a structural shidduch crisis gripped medieval Jewry — young women could not find matches because of dowry laws that followed from the devastation of the Crusades. The Gedolim of Shum convened in Troyes, enacted a takanah, and resolved the crisis. It is codified in the Shulchan Aruch. They identified the structural cause, legislated a fix, and saved their daughters. We need a Takanas Shum 2.0.
The Obligation Is Now
Torah and science speak in unison. We call upon yeshivos to eliminate the Freezer entirely — or at minimum allow bochurim traveling home for Chanukah to date. The halacha is clear. The science confirms it. We have no excuse to stand by.
V'ahavta l'rei'acha kamocha — this is not merely a suggestion. It is a chiyuv.
Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp. Decided March 4, 2026 | Justice Sotomayor | Docket 24-1021
In a significant ruling affecting public transportation liability, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that New Jersey Transit Corporation is not an arm of the State of New Jersey and therefore cannot claim sovereign immunity to shield itself from personal injury lawsuits filed in other states.
The case arose from two separate incidents — one in New York, one in Pennsylvania — where individuals were struck by NJ Transit buses. NJ Transit sought dismissal of both suits by arguing it was entitled to New Jersey's sovereign immunity as a state entity. The two state courts reached opposite conclusions, creating a conflict that the Supreme Court agreed to resolve.
The Court's ruling turned on a straightforward but consequential point: NJ Transit is structured as a legally independent corporation that is responsible for its own debts and judgments. New Jersey's own founding statute for NJ Transit explicitly states that its liabilities are not the State's liabilities. That separation, the Court held, is decisive — you cannot claim a state's immunity if the state itself has disclaimed responsibility for your obligations.
Practical Impact: Injury victims struck by NJ Transit buses in other states may now pursue their claims in their home state courts without facing dismissal on sovereign immunity grounds. The New York ruling was affirmed and the Pennsylvania dismissal was reversed, with both cases sent back for further proceedings.
אמר רבי יצחק: שנה שמלך המשיח נגלה בו, כל מלכי אומות העולם מתגרים זה בזה.
מלך פרס מתגרה במלך ערבי, והולך מלך ערבי לארם ליטול עצה מהם, וחוזר מלך פרס ומחריב את כל העולם כולו.
וכל אומות העולם מתרעשים ומתבהלים ונופלים על פניהם, ויאחוז אותם צירים כצירי יולדה.
וישראל מתרעשים ומתבהלים ואומרים: 'להיכן נבוא ונלך? להיכן נבוא ונלך?'
ואומר להם: 'בניי, אל תתיראו! כל מה שעשיתי לא עשיתי אלא בשבילכם. מפני מה אתם מתיראים? אל תיראו, הגיע זמן גאולתכם!'"
THE
KOSHER CONSUMERS UNION, INC.
⚠ CONSUMER ALERT ⚠
APEEL COATING ON FRESH PRODUCE
SERIOUS KASHRUS CONCERNS
Apeel (also marketed as Edipeel)
is an invisible, plant-based edible coating applied directly to fresh produce
to extend shelf life. It works by sealing the outer layer of the fruit or
vegetable, slowing moisture loss and blocking oxygen. It is designed to
withstand normal rinsing and cannot simply be washed off — it is intended to be
consumed along with the produce.
Apeel is currently being applied
to the following produce items:
•
Avocados, Cucumbers, Limes, Mandarins,
Apples
The concern is most acute for
produce where the skin is eaten — cucumbers, apples, limes, and mandarins — as
the coating is designed to be consumed along with the fruit.
1. No Kosher
Certification
Apeel carries no kosher
certification of any kind. While the manufacturer has stated that its
ingredients are not derived from animal sources, there is no rabbinic
supervision or hashgacha of any sort over the production process.
2. Stam Yeinam /
Yayin Nesech — The Grapeseed Issue
Industry reports indicate that
Apeel frequently uses grapeseed oil — a cheap byproduct of the commercial wine
industry — as its fatty acid source. Uncertified grapeseed derivatives raise a
severe Stam Yeinam / Yayin Nesech concern, which is among the most serious
kashrus issues in this matter.
3. Mono- and
Diglycerides
Apeel’s active ingredients are
mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids — the same emulsifiers that are routinely
derived from non-kosher animal fat (tallow) in commercial production. Even
where a plant-based source is claimed, physical verification of the facility
and supply chain is required before any hechsher can be granted.
4. Shared Equipment
and Processing Solvents
The
chemical extraction and purification process uses heat, solvents, and
catalysts. Without verified supervision of the processing facilities, there is
no assurance that the equipment is free from cross-contamination with
non-kosher oils or animal fats.
Until a thorough review of Apeel’s
specific manufacturing facilities has been completed and proper rabbinic
supervision is obtained, produce bearing this coating should not be used
without guidance from a competent halachic authority.
The Kosher Consumers Union, Inc. • EIN:
16-1719040 • New Jersey
A Pesach program with a private Seder,
Executive Suites, Reading areas, 24 Hr Tea-Room,
Flexible itinerary, On-site Parking,
Shul seats for the entire Family, Familiar guests,
Your standard of kashrus, Very Heimish atmosphere.
Called Home, sweet, home.
If it's a MUST that one has to go to a hotel for Pesach,
Oppenheimer's Hotel is under the Hashgocha of KAJ (Breuers) all year including PESACH
|

KCL allows pizza stores to allow the non-Jewish delivery drivers to have rolls of KCL tape, and seal the pizza boxes in their car at the delivery.
KCL allows shabbos catered affairs to have it delivered by non-jewish drivers unsealed.
KCL allows caterers to have shabbos goyim, do pick ups on shabbos of ice or anything they need from the commissary.
Rav Shach was asked whether Yungerleit should go to an out-of-Town kolel or remain in
Lakewood with a much larger group learning in the Bais Medrash Govoha’ s kolel.
Rav
Shach's clear opinion was, that a yungerman can shteig the most by going to an out-of-town
kolel within three to four months after their wedding. Some of the reasoning
was that by remaining in Lakewood, they must attend various Simchas from both
sides, visit the in-laws on a pretty steady basis, and the in-laws or other
family members exchange Shabbos etc. , it does take away a considerable amount of time from
learning. The Masmid will always outdo all others in success in shteiging and
learning. Also, not getting enough rest is an area of concern.
Rav Shach said that going to an out of town Kolel, Is incredibly beneficial for Sholom Bayis overall.
Out
of Town kolel, one would have to be on time for Davening, and all Sedorim must
be attended. In an out-of-Town kolel, each looks for the other to get them
comfortably acclimated, the wives get friends much faster, etc. In addition, the
wives will be able to get jobs as teachers in the local schools, which will impact
the curriculum and the children learning in the schools.
Eventually,
some of the yungerleit will become Rebbeim in the Schools, giving a different "Ruach"
to the Schools.
The
amount of time spent learning will be much more productive in an an-out-of-Town
kolel. Rav Shach said it would save the Yah'hadus of America by having so many
out-of-Town-Kolelim.
Rav
Shach said that certain Gevirim, Roshei Yeshiva, etc. would insist that their
children should remain in Lakewood and eventually become Roshei Chaburah, get a
position as a Rosh Yeshiva, etc., so there has to be Roshei Yeshiva that will
be able to make those decisions for the benefit of the yungerleit and the
Yeshiva.
Next step, we spoke to some of the older Talmidim of Reb Ahron Kotler, who already had their own Yeshiva, to talk to the Lakewood Roshei Yeshiva to implement the program. They tried talking to them but were unsuccessful in convincing them of the program's benefits. Reb Elya, Z"L said ver fun zei hubben dem gushpanka tzu zugen du bleib, und du zulst gein; keiner nisht!
Update: Rav Breitowitz was asked to propose this initiative at an Agudah convention, He said the Balei Batim loved the Idea, but there was push back from BMG.
The concern spans multiple slaughter/production seasons over roughly two years, meaning significant quantities may already be in home freezers, butcher shops, and institutional kitchens.
Two specific products:
a premium frozen beef “asado” cut with bone under the Super Beef brand, and an asado-with-bone product marketed by Of Yerushalayim, produced in Paraguay. Consumers and retailers are instructed not to use the meat unless it is immediately corrected by a qualified menakker under kosher supervision, and to return affected product to the point of sale or through kashrut supervisors for reprocessing.
This is a halachic/kashrut compliance issue—not a food safety recall—but the Rabbinate is treating it as an urgent “stumbling block” and says distributors and mashgichim have been directed to pull and fix inventory fast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have been A Toen in Botei-Din for Numerous years, I retired after seeing first hand the behind the scene of just about all of them.
In the past year, I had a Choshen Mishpat Din Torah, I only agreed to go to the Bais Din of America.
I lost at the Din-Torah, yet I still recommend to everyone, that the Bais-Din to go to, is the Bais-Din of America.
Address
|
|
Central NJ Attorneys Experienced in Fighting Police Misconduct & Illegal Arrests
| Name | Firm | Location | Phone |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent J. Sanzone Jr. | Law Office of Vincent J. Sanzone Jr. | Elizabeth, NJ | (908) 354-7006 |
| Shelley L. Stangler | Law Offices of Shelley L. Stangler, P.C. | Springfield / Roseland, NJ | (973) 379-9572 or (877) 267-9907 |
| Brian J. Zeiger | The Zeiger Firm | Lawrence Township, NJ | (609) 215-7077 |
| Christopher J. Keating | Keating Law Firm, LLC | Moorestown, NJ | (856) 519-5011 |
| Clifford E. Lazzaro | Law Office of Clifford E. Lazzaro, P.C. | Freehold, NJ | (732) 780-5200 |
| Jonathan F. Marshall | Law Offices of Jonathan F. Marshall | Freehold & Statewide, NJ | (732) 462-1197 |